Data card

Death at birth

Print edition : June 14, 2013
India has persistently high rates of newborn mortality, over three lakh a year, and accounts for 29 per cent of all first-day deaths globally.

MORE than one million babies die on the first day of life globally, making the first 24 hours the most dangerous day for babies in nearly every country.

These are some of the key findings in Save the Children’s 14th annual “State of the World’s Mothers” report:

Every year, 40 million women give birth at home without the help of a skilled birth attendant.

Every day, 800 women die during pregnancy or childbirth and 8,000 newborn babies die in their first month of life.

Newborn deaths account for 43 per cent of all deaths among children under age five.

Three million newborn babies die every year—mostly owing to easily preventable or treatable causes such as infections, complications at birth and complications of prematurity.

Sixty per cent of infant deaths occur in the first month of life. Among those, nearly three-fourths (two million a year) occur in the first week after birth.

Nearly all newborn and maternal deaths (98 and 99 per cent, respectively) occur in developing countries where pregnant women and newborn babies lack access to basic health-care services.

The Indian scene

India has persistently high rates of newborn mortality—over three lakh a year— and accounts for 29 per cent of all first-day deaths globally, says the report.

Quoting Sample Registration Survey (SRS 2011) figures, the report says Madhya Pradesh has the highest burden of early newborn deaths at 32, followed closely by Uttar Pradesh and Odisha (30). Kerala is the leader in reducing neonatal mortality by a wide margin, while Tamil Nadu, Delhi and Maharashtra too have bucked the national rate of 24.

Clearly, all babies born in India do not get an equal chance of survival. Inequities are persistent and widening.

Children born in socially and economically disadvantaged families have a higher newborn mortality level.

Babies born to the poorest families have a much higher risk of death compared with babies from the richest families.

Children from poor households are more likely to be exposed to diseases and have lower resistance because of malnutrition. They are also less likely to receive preventive interventions as their families have limited resources.

Inter-State disparities: The highest regional inequality in early neonatal mortality is in the Empowered Action Group (EAG) region, which is the most backward in terms of socio-economic and health indicators, such as Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh.

Rural-Urban divide:Rural areas distinctively show higher newborn mortality rates than urban centres. However, recent evidence shows that health indicators among the urban poor are equally bad, sometimes even worse.

Education: Another inequity exists in the level of education and age of the mother. For successive years neonatal mortality rate among children born to illiterate mothers has been higher than those born to mothers with some education.

Age of mother:The National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) data also show that neonatal death is directly related to the mother’s age at birth. The lower the age, the lesser will be her baby’s chance of survival.

Caste difference:Children born to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe families have a higher risk of dying than others. While there has been a decline in child mortality in all other social groups, the decline among these two groups has been much lower.

A letter from the Editor


Dear reader,

The COVID-19-induced lockdown and the absolute necessity for human beings to maintain a physical distance from one another in order to contain the pandemic has changed our lives in unimaginable ways. The print medium all over the world is no exception.

As the distribution of printed copies is unlikely to resume any time soon, Frontline will come to you only through the digital platform until the return of normality. The resources needed to keep up the good work that Frontline has been doing for the past 35 years and more are immense. It is a long journey indeed. Readers who have been part of this journey are our source of strength.

Subscribing to the online edition, I am confident, will make it mutually beneficial.

Sincerely,

R. Vijaya Sankar

Editor, Frontline

Support Quality Journalism

MEDIA

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
×