Data Card

Organic farming

Print edition : August 08, 2014
The entry of big business defeats the organic farming movement’s raison d’etre—to counter the corporatisation of agricultural practices.

THE world over, organic farming is growing rapidly in area and market size but becoming similar in characteristics to conventional agriculture and agricultural markets. The unique philosophy under which the organic agriculture movement started out in the 1960s is getting subsumed in the market economics that it set out to be an alternative to.

According to “The world of organic agriculture: Statistics and emerging trends 2014”, published by the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) and the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), the area under organic cultivation increased from 11 million hectares in 1999 to 37.5 million hectares in 2012. The global market for organic produce grew from $15 billion in 1999 to $64 billion in 2012.

Small land share

However, despite this growth, the share of the world’s organic agricultural land vis-a-vis the total agricultural land is a mere 0.9 per cent. According to the FIBL-IFOAM annual survey, Oceania, at 2.9 per cent, has the highest share, followed by Europe with 2.2 per cent and Latin America with 1.1 per cent.

Among countries, India has the highest number of organic producers—600,000. It has 500,000 hectares under organic cultivation. However, this is only a 0.3 per cent share of the agricultural land in the country.

The productivity per hectare is lower in organic farms when compared with conventional farms. But organic produce fetches a higher price owing to an ever-increasing demand for organic food. Meeting that demand requires economies of scale that local independent growers find difficult to meet.

Entry of big business

This rather skewed situation is resulting in larger corporations and supermarket chains entering the organic market, because they have developed and perfected the collection, delivery and marketing practices for conventionally grown foods. Coca-Cola, Pepsico, General Mills and Kellogg’s are some of the big names that appear in the organic food market in the United States and in other parts of the world.

This is not what the organic farming movement had set out to do. Fired by Rachel Carson’s 1962 publication Silent Spring, the environmental movement had returned to organic farming to counter the corporatisation of agricultural practices and markets. The idea was to produce locally, without chemical inputs, and consume locally through local markets.

Carbon footprint

The organic produce today is as much a globally traded commodity as its conventionally produced counterpart. The production and consumption statistics in the FiBL-IFOAM report reveal this fact. In 2012, the largest market was the U.S. with sales of nearly $30 billion, followed by Germany ($9 billion) and France ($5 billion). Canada, the United Kingdom, Italy, Switzerland, Austria, Japan and Spain are the other countries among the top 10 marketplaces for organic foods.

However, the consuming countries are not always the producers. The 10 countries with the largest areas under organic agriculture in 2012 were Australia, Argentina, the U.S., China, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, Uruguay and Canada.

This means that the retail customer for organic food in a supermarket in the U.S. could as well be buying a fruit grown in Australia and air-transported for thousands of kilometres. Fruit to fruit, this may mean a larger carbon footprint for the organic fruit than its conventional counterpart in the next shelf.

S. Gopikrishna Warrier is regional environment manager with Panos South Asia. The views expressed in this article are personal.

Source: The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2014, published by the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) and the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM).

A letter from the Editor


Dear reader,

The COVID-19-induced lockdown and the absolute necessity for human beings to maintain a physical distance from one another in order to contain the pandemic has changed our lives in unimaginable ways. The print medium all over the world is no exception.

As the distribution of printed copies is unlikely to resume any time soon, Frontline will come to you only through the digital platform until the return of normality. The resources needed to keep up the good work that Frontline has been doing for the past 35 years and more are immense. It is a long journey indeed. Readers who have been part of this journey are our source of strength.

Subscribing to the online edition, I am confident, will make it mutually beneficial.

Sincerely,

R. Vijaya Sankar

Editor, Frontline

Support Quality Journalism

MEDIA

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
×