Television and the public good

Published : Feb 25, 2011 00:00 IST

Text of a letter by journalist David Frost published in The Times of July 18, 1968.

SIR, I have just had an opportunity to study Lord Justice Salmon's comments at the close of the Savundra Appeal.

Of course everyone has a right to air their opinions about television, whatever their profession, but facts are a different matter and surely the first thing a Judge, of all people, should do is to check his facts.

Had anyone on The Frost Programme had any reason to think a prosecution of Dr. Savundra was imminent, we would not have dreamt of interviewing him about F.A.M. There had been no police action in the seven months following the initial newspaper coverage, and there was no official indication that there would be. Nevertheless, we checked privately with the Board of Trade and elsewhere and were informed We have nothing on Dr. Savundra. Go ahead.'

At no point, as far as I am aware, did Lord Justice Salmon attempt to ascertain from anyone connected with the programme these events preceding the interview of 18 months ago. One is reminded of Maitland's dictum that it is sometimes difficult to remember that events now in the past were once in the future.

As it is we are left with a situation where, if the Judge's words were to be taken seriously, television programmes unearthing, say, a new Rachman would have to persuade a newspaper to print the fact before they could contemplate broadcasting it! And indeed even the newspaper would not necessarily be on safe ground.

We are all concerned about individual rights in Britain today but one of the most precious of the rights that the public has is the simple one of hearing the truth whenever and wherever it is available.

Television has shown that it has a real part to play in seeking the truth about matters of public concern, and to remove television from this role seems to be doing both public and individual a positive disservice.

Trial by television' seems to be becoming more a slogan than an argument but even those who employ the phrase most sternly would agree that it is a rare, if not virtually non-existent, phenomenon. Would it now be unfair to suggest that tirade without trial by Judge is becoming a somewhat more prominent feature of our national life?

Sign in to Unlock member-only benefits!
  • Bookmark stories to read later.
  • Comment on stories to start conversations.
  • Subscribe to our newsletters.
  • Get notified about discounts and offers to our products.
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment