Sanctions farce: The U.S.' move to steal the Afghan people's money

The Biden administration’s decision to freeze $7 billion of Afghanistan’s assets, which has pushed the country into a deeper economic and humanitarian crisis, is widely decried.

Published : Mar 15, 2022 06:00 IST

At a protest  against the U.S. government’s move to freeze Afghanistan’s assets, in Kabul on February 15, 2022.

At a protest against the U.S. government’s move to freeze Afghanistan’s assets, in Kabul on February 15, 2022.

Even as the events in Ukraine were reaching a critical stage, the United States thought it was an opportune moment to further turn the financial screws on Afghanistan, a country devastated by two decades of U.S. occupation and war and where a humanitarian disaster on a gargantuan scale is unfolding. In the second week of February, the Joe Biden administration took the unprecedented decision to freeze $7 billion in assets belonging to Da Afghanistan Bank (DAB), Afghanistan’s central bank, parked in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

U.S. President Joe Biden issued an executive order invoking emergency powers to freeze money that belongs to the people of Afghanistan. Afghanistan has another $2 billion similarly invested in European banks. This money, too, cannot be withdrawn by the Afghan government because of the prevailing U.S. sanctions on the Taliban. Until last year, DAB used to withdraw funds from these accounts regularly to ensure liquidity and stabilise the bank rate in the country.

Adding grievous insult to injury, the Biden administration also announced that it would be seeking permission from a court to move $3.5 billion of the frozen monies to compensate the families of the victims who perished in the September 11, 2001, terror attacks on New York. In September last year, a group of 150 relatives of the U.S. victims of the attacks succeeded in getting a judge in New York to pass an order to serve “a writ of petition” to seize the Afghan accounts in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The Biden administration, invoking presidential prerogative and “national interests”, intervened and told the court that only half of the assets would be seized and distributed to the kin of the victims who had sued.

The U.S. government said that it would be keeping the rest of the money in a trust fund intended to help the people of Afghanistan. Some $0.5 billion of the amount seized belongs to commercial banks where the savings of Afghan citizens were deposited.

Also read: Amid economic turmoil, people in Afghanistan struggle to make ends meet

The Taliban, which seized power in 2021, has not interfered with the working of the DAB, which was designed by U.S. economists. It has retained the governing board that the previous government had put in place. Two U.S. citizens continue to serve on the governing board. Also, the Taliban has not changed the banking laws.

Shah Mehrabi, an economics professor in a U.S. college and serves on the central bank’s supreme council, said: “All the foreign exchange reserves that are in the U.S. and Europe belong to the Afghan people. The decision to release only part of the funds will continue to hurt millions of Afghan children, women and families who are suffering one of the worst humanitarian crises in the world.”

Questionable decision

The move by the Biden administration is unprecedented as this is the first time it has seized money belonging to a foreign government from an institution on U.S. soil. The U.S. government is supposed to be holding the money in trust on behalf of the government in Afghanistan. Even legal experts in the U.S. have questioned the administration’s move given the fact that the U.S. has still not recognised the Taliban administration as the legal government of Afghanistan.

Some relatives of the victims of the September 11 attacks have openly disagreed with Biden’s decision to expropriate a poor country’s scarce foreign exchange reserves. They have said that all the money should go to the people of Afghanistan. As it is, the victims of the attacks have already received significant compensation, over $2 million per victim, from the U.S. government. Barry Amundson, who lost his brother in the September 2001 terror strike on the Pentagon, told mediapersons that he would have preferred all the money to go the suffering people of Afghanistan. He said that it would be a betrayal of Afghans if the money is given to families of the September 11 victims.

Also read: How the West bungled in Afghanistan

The Biden administration’s move will further undermine the stability of the banking system in Afghanistan. The September 11 attacks may have been planned in Afghanistan by Al Qaeda’s top leadership, which was based there at the time. But the Taliban, according to most counter-terrorism experts, could not have been privy to the plot. Fifteen of the 19 persons involved in carrying out the September 11 attacks were Saudi nationals.

A White House Fact sheet explaining the presidential order said that Afghanistan’s economy “was on the brink” even before August 2021 and had “worsened due to the uncertainty and perceived risk surrounding the Taliban’s capacity to run the economy”. The Biden administration seems to have forgotten that the government that ran the economy to the ground was a U.S.-backed one. The corruption and mismanagement were going on right beneath the watchful Americans.

After taking power in Kabul, the Taliban government immediately asked for the funds to be transferred back to its central bank. The economy of the country, never in good shape, went into a tailspin after the Taliban took over the government. The flow of billions of dollars into the country from aid agencies, which went on until the middle of last year, has now stopped completely. The U.S. sanctions imposed on the country after the Taliban’s takeover made things worse for the Afghan people. With access to international financial institutions cut and the government coffers empty, the Taliban government was in desperate need of cash infusion. Foreign funding had helped pay for three-fourths of public spending in the country before the Taliban takeover.

Impact on society

The financial strain is impacting, among other areas, the country’s health infrastructure too. It is on the verge of collaps as doctors and nurses have not been paid for months. According to reports, 90 per cent of the country’s health clinics will be forced to shut down in the coming months owing to a lack of funding and medical supplies. The banks in the country have virtually run out of foreign currency and the value of the Afghan currency has depreciated by more than 25 per cent since the Taliban took over. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) said that since the freezing of the country’s reserves, “cash shortages and loss of corresponding banking relationships have crippled Afghan banks”.

Most of the Afghan population is currently unemployed and hungry. Aid organisations are saying that more than a million Afghan children are in danger of dying of hunger if urgent food aid does not materialise. According to the United Nations’ Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO), 8.7 million Afghans are facing a famine-like situation—the worst stage of hunger. To further complicate matters, the country is experiencing its worst period of drought in decades, which is severely impacting domestic food production and adding to inflationary woes. Afghanistan’s wheat harvest this year is expected to be 25 per cent below average.

Also read: Afghans struggle to finance their daily lives

In rural areas, where the majority of the population lives, most of the farmers have stopped cultivating their holdings. According to the U.N., three-fourths of the population have slipped into “acute poverty”. Mary-Ellen McGroarty, Director of the World Food Program (WFP) in Afghanistan, has warned that millions of Afghans, the majority of them women and children, “are being condemned to a winter of absolute desperation and potentially death”. Antonio Guterres, U.N. Secretary-General, told the U.N. Security Council in January that Afghanistan “was hanging by a thread”, and called on all member states to suspend all sanctions that impede the delivery of humanitarian relief to the country. The U.N. also appealed to international donors seeking $5 billion in aid to ward off a humanitarian disaster.

The Taliban government had repeatedly requested the U.S. government to lift the draconian sanctions it had imposed on the country and release the central bank’s frozen funds that the country so desperately needs. After Biden announced his decision to unilaterally give half of the DAB’s monies to the families of the September 11 attack victims, the Taliban warned that it would reconsider its policy towards the U.S. unless the money belonging to Afghanistan was returned. In a statement, it said: “If the United States does not deviate from its position and continues its provocative actions, the Islamic Emirate will also be forced to reconsider its policy towards the country. The Islamic Emirate strongly rejects Biden’s unjustified actions as a violation of the rights of all Afghans.”

The Taliban government reiterated that Afghans had nothing to do with the September 11 attacks. Mullah Yaqoob, Afghanistan’s acting Defence Minister, said: “No Afghan was involved in that incident at all.” He is the son of the Taliban’s founder, Mullah Mohammed Omar. Local residents in Afghanistan are also shocked by the U.S. move, especially the decision to give half of the money to the families of September 11 attack victims.

Khalid Zadran, the spokesman for the Afghanistan police force, said on Twitter that his countrymen will fight like they did for 20 years to get back the money frozen by the U.S. as it was their right.

Also read: Desperate Afghans forced to sell children

Within the U.S. as well as in the international community there is a demand that the administration should differentiate between a Taliban government in Kabul and the insurgent movement the U.S. forces battled for 20 years. Some members of the U.S. Congress have written to Biden saying that the “confiscation” of Afghanistan’s currency reserves was plunging the country “deeper into an economic and humanitarian crisis”. Senator Bernie Sanders urged the Biden administration in January to “immediately release billions in frozen Afghan government funds” to avert a humanitarian catastrophe and prevent the deaths of millions of people.

But the Biden administration is unrelenting. Many Americans say that the U.S. is now conducting its “forever war” in Afghanistan through economic sanctions and other means. Just days after Kabul fell, the Biden administration issued orders to paralyse the country’s banking system. Although the Taliban government, after the takeover, was entitled to receive more than $460 million from the IMF in currency reserves, known as drawing rights, the U.S. stepped in to block those funds. Although the U.S. has apparently granted certain exemptions for humanitarian aid to Afghanistan, the lack of clarity in its sanctions laws has prevented financial institutions from engaging with the Taliban government. Decades of civil strife and U.S. occupation have left the country almost totally dependent on foreign aid and assistance for survival, at least in the short term.

As was widely predicted, the U.S.’ moves that led to blocking of funds and curtailing of aid precipitated the economic meltdown and complicated the situation created by the ongoing drought. The aim of the U.S. sanctions is to alienate the public from the Taliban government by destabilising civil society. The U.S. sanctions on Afghanistan are similar to those imposed by it on Cuba, Venezuela, Syria and other countries, with Russia being the latest entrant into the league.

Amir Khan Muttaqi, the acting Afghan Foreign Minister, wrote to the U.S. government in November 2021 on the urgent need to unfreeze Afghan foreign reserves, saying that the “fundamental challenge of our people is financial security, and the roots of this concern lead back to the freezing of assets of our people by the American government”.

Exposing U.S. hypocrisy on the issue, he said that the Biden administration “froze our assets and then told us it will provide humanitarian aid”.

More stories from this issue

Sign in to Unlock member-only benefits!
  • Bookmark stories to read later.
  • Comment on stories to start conversations.
  • Subscribe to our newsletters.
  • Get notified about discounts and offers to our products.
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment