YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, a 29-year-old from India living in Germany, has recently set Indian social media humming with a video criticising the direction his country was moving in under Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Rathee’s video “Is India becoming a DICTATORSHIP?” has amassed over 24 million views since it was uploaded in late February. In it, the creator cites instances of media control and claims state agencies are being used against opposition leaders, eventually alleging that these efforts are part of a broader trend to silence Modi’s rivals.
Rathee has some 17.6 million subscribers on YouTube. And the platform is booming in India—it currently has over 460 million users in the world’s most populous country. By 2029, it is expected to have over 859 million Indian users, according to estimates by Statista, an online platform specialising in data gathering and visualisation.
Also Read | Dhruv Rathee: ‘No matter which party comes to power, I will keep questioning the government’
As more and more people turn to YouTube to get news, more journalists are also migrating to the platform to cover Indian news and politics, hoping to find a way out of India’s more traditional and polarised media landscape.
Newsrooms ‘diminished’
The space for independent reporters in India’s newsrooms has been shrinking for a while. Independent journalist Ravish Kumar, one of the country’s best-known media personalities, says many journalists have been ideologically transformed and are increasingly influenced by the state.
“Even if there is a political change, it will not change the situation in the media. The way the newsroom has been diminished, there has been a cascading effect in local newsrooms across states in India as well,” Kumar, who used to work for the mainstream NDTV media channel, said.
He is now a one-man media company and boasts 8 million subscribers on YouTube, where he launched his channel in October 2022. “Mainstream media does a banal analysis of data and there is very little factual analysis of the prime minister’s speeches. There is only a reproduction of biases, which has been done in the last few elections,” Kumar said.
Tweaking laws to control messaging
Recently, however, the government has been pushing amendments to existing media laws. The laws include the Telecommunications Bill of 2023, the draft Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill of 2023, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act of 2023. Critics say that officials want to have more control over what can be posted on the internet.
In the first week of April, YouTube removed the channel of digital Hindi news outlet “Bolta Hindustan”, which had close to 3,00,000 subscribers. YouTube refused to give any reasons for the suspension, but some reports indicate it was done on instructions from the Indian government. The move also comes just months after the “Bolta Hindustan” handle was suspended on Instagram.
“The government has a way of getting to you,” political satirist Akash Banerjee said. “You cannot fully be yourself. Of course, there is self-censorship here, too. One must be controlled, as I know the knock on my door can happen, too,” added the host of the political satire channel “The DeshBhakt” (The Patriot) on YouTube.
BJP boasts its own influencers
Indian authorities blocked 104 YouTube channels and 45 videos from the beginning of 2021 to October 2022, under the provisions of the Information Technology (IT) Act, which can be invoked to restrict access to content in the interest of the sovereignty and integrity of the country. The government has also repeatedly clashed with X, formerly Twitter.
In 2023, social media platforms were directed to block a BBC documentary that implicated Modi in the 2002 Gujarat riots. Sharing links and clips from the documentary was banned, and the government deployed police to stop students from screening the film.
The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party has also tried to rope in YouTube and Instagram influencers and gain their help to promote its campaigns and shape voters’ opinions ahead of the general election set to start on April 19.
‘The crackdown has been way too transparent’
Digital players have been “doing more public interest journalism, news, and commentary than legacy media over the past several years”, said Abhinandan Sekhri, co-founder and CEO of the Indian media watchdog Newslaundry.
“The government sees this and has since amended and introduced several rules to have more control and tighter regulation of the digital space,” he said. “The blocking of YouTube channels and social media accounts is only the next step in this ongoing trend. The crackdown has been way too transparent and unselfconscious for any self-respecting democracy,” he added.
‘Fake news’ watchdog put on hold
And yet, there are some positive signals for those who warn that the government is trying to tighten its grip on the media. In March, the Supreme Court of India put on hold an official initiative to identify fake news related to the government.
Also Read | Muzzling the press
The official Fact Check Unit (FCU) had been formed to respond to any posts that it deemed fake or containing misleading facts about the business of the government. Part of the response would be to flag those posts to social media intermediaries.
The initiative was challenged in court by the stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra, who argued that the FCU would coerce social media companies to implement censorship of online content pertaining to the government. “The establishment of the FCU would muzzle speech against the government. The new IT rules will have a chilling effect on free speech. Elections are coming, the public must have all information about the government, not information filtered out as “fake” by the government,” Kamra said.
