Hopes of Gaza ceasefire dashed after Israel rejects proposal for ‘sustainable calm’

Despite Hamas’ acceptance of the ceasefire, Israel vows to continue its operation in Rafah.

Published : May 07, 2024 15:22 IST - 6 MINS READ

Palestinians inspect the site of an Israeli strike on a house, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip on May 7.

Palestinians inspect the site of an Israeli strike on a house, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip on May 7. | Photo Credit: HATEM KHALED/REUTERS

The Palestinian militant group Hamas said it had agreed to a ceasefire proposal for the Gaza Strip, but Israel’s war cabinet unanimously rejected it as “far from Israel’s necessary demands”, dashing hopes for an immediate pause in the fighting.

Israel vowed to continue “its operation in Rafah to exert military pressure on Hamas” but also said it will send a delegation to meet with mediators “to exhaust the possibility of reaching an agreement.” In a statement later on May 6, the Israel Defense Forces announced fresh airstrikes against Hamas targets in the Rafah area.

The Israeli response followed hours after Hamas had posted a statement to Telegram saying that Ismail Haniyeh, the head of the Hamas political office, had accepted a Qatari and Egyptian ceasefire proposal. Questions were raised almost immediately about the details, with both US and Israeli officials saying they were studying the Hamas response.

Benny Gantz, a centrist who joined the war cabinet, said in a post on Telegram that the proposal offered by Hamas “does not correspond to the dialogue that has taken place so far with the mediators and has significant gaps”. He said an Israeli delegation nonetheless will meet with negotiators in Cairo.

Also Read | Gaza: Scarred, ruined, and silenced by death

Hamas and Israel have been negotiating via Qatar, Egypt, and the US on an agreement that would see the release of Israeli hostages held in Gaza in exchange for Palestinians detained in Israeli jails. It would also include a pause in fighting.

‘Sustainable calm’

The proposal and ceasefire that Hamas said it could accept has minor wording changes from the one that Israel and the US had presented to the group, The New York Times reported. The proposal calls for the eventual enactment of a “sustainable calm”, the paper reported citing two officials familiar with the revised plan. The officials, who were not identified, said the changes were made by Arab mediators in consultation with US Central Intelligence Agency Director William Burns and the wording was something all sides had earlier said they could accept.

The officials also said they expected warring parties would likely clash over the definition of “sustainable calm”, the paper reported.

Israeli cabinet minister Itamar Ben Gvir was the first Israeli official to address the Hamas response to the ceasefire proposal, saying it was no more than a trick. “Hamas’ shenanigans have only one answer: an immediate order to occupy Rafah! Increasing military pressure, crushing Hamas, and proceeding to its ultimate defeat,” Ben Gvir said in a post on X.

Tensions rise

Those talks had stalled over the Iran-backed militant group’s insistence that any truce be permanent, leading to the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. Israel has said it must eliminate Hamas before ending the war.

Tensions also increased after Hamas killed four Israeli soldiers with a rocket barrage on May 5 on the border crossing of Kerem Shalom, one of its worst missile attacks in weeks. Israel has insisted on a phased approach to any ceasefire, saying Hamas must first commit to the release of about three dozen hostages in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners. 

“I want it to succeed, but the cold, sort of cool analyst in me says the fundamental divide between the two combatants— Israel and Hamas—makes it more likely that we’ll see many more weeks if not months, of violence than we’ll see some sort of off-ramp to a diplomatic settlement,” said Brian Katulis, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute who previously worked at the US National Security Council.

At the same time, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has insisted that Israel will go ahead with its invasion of Rafah, in Gaza’s south, where Israeli forces say Hamas still holds sway. On May 6, Israel told some civilians to move out of parts of Rafah, a possible prelude to a long-expected attack on the city where more than a million Palestinians have sought shelter from the war.

The Israel Defense Forces “will act with extreme force against terrorist organizations in your areas of residence,” a spokesman said on X on May 6. He urged residents of eastern Rafah to go north to an “expanded humanitarian area” near Khan Younis, another city in Gaza.

Evacuation begins in Rafah

Large numbers of people started leaving Rafah in cars, on foot and on horse-drawn carriages. A spokesman for the Israeli military said its Air Force struck 50 targets in Rafah on May 6.

Displaced Palestinians flee Rafah with their belongings to safer areas in the southern Gaza Strip on May 7 following an evacuation order by the Israeli army the previous day, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas.

Displaced Palestinians flee Rafah with their belongings to safer areas in the southern Gaza Strip on May 7 following an evacuation order by the Israeli army the previous day, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas. | Photo Credit: AFP

President Joe Biden has called a Rafah invasion a “red line”, and he and other top US officials have repeatedly warned that Israel must not launch such an attack without protecting civilians. During a visit to Tel Aviv last week, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said, “We’ve not seen such a plan.” Biden and Netanyahu spoke on May 6. National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said Biden had again made clear the US view about “operations in Rafah that could potentially put more than a million innocent people at greater risk.”

If a ceasefire had been reached, it would have brought about a halt in fighting between Israel and Hamas for the first time since a similar accord in late November. The impasse could allow talks to begin regarding a permanent truce while letting much-needed aid be delivered to Gaza’s war-ravaged population. Hamas is designated a terrorist organisation by the US and the European Union.

Gaza ‘choked off’ from aid: UN agencies

UN agencies said on May 7 that the two main crossings into the Gaza Strip remain shut, virtually cutting off the enclave from outside aid with very few stores stationed inside the enclave. The global agency’s humanitarian office spokesperson Jens Laerke said at a Geneva press briefing that Israel had shut both the Rafah and Kerem Shalom crossings as part of its Rafah military operation.

Also Read | Israel’s diversionary attack on Iran has set off a new security crisis in West Asia

“The two main arteries for getting aid into Gaza are currently choked off,” he said, saying that U.N. agencies had very low stocks inside the Gaza Strip since humanitarian supplies are consumed straight away. “If no fuel comes in for a prolonged period of time it would be a very effective way of putting the humanitarian operation in its grave,” he added.

Egypt warned that Israel’s operation in Rafah threatens ceasefire efforts, shortly after the Israeli military took control of the vital Rafah border crossing between the Palestinian enclave and Egypt, according to the foreign ministry.

Turkish Vice President Cevdet Yilmaz said the operation in Rafah—a day after Hamas accepted a ceasefire deal—marks another war crime by Israel. “By carrying out a ground attack on Rafah, just a day after Hamas approved Qatar and Egypt’s proposal for a ceasefire deal, Israel has added another to the war crimes it has committed in Palestinian territories since October 7,” Yilmaz said on social media platform X. Ankara would continue working for the Israeli leadership to be legally punished, he added.

(with inputs from Bloomberg and Reuters)

+ SEE all Stories
Sign in to Unlock member-only benefits!
  • Bookmark stories to read later.
  • Comment on stories to start conversations.
  • Subscribe to our newsletters.
  • Get notified about discounts and offers to our products.
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment