Explained: Why West Asian countries are yet to take sides in the Ukraine conflict

Security, trade and oil ties make it hard for these states to openly condemn the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Published : Mar 04, 2022 16:59 IST

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. In 2018, Saudi Arabian leadership was under fire for the gruesome murder of Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi in Istanbul.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. In 2018, Saudi Arabian leadership was under fire for the gruesome murder of Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi in Istanbul.

At first, it seemed they couldn't decide whose side they were on. Earlier this week, a number of West Asian nations, who are traditionally friendly with the United States and the European Union, didn't want to immediately or overtly condemn the Russian invasion of Ukraine. But over the past few days this has changed. After initially appearing reluctant to join a United Nations resolution condemning the invasion and calling on Russia to withdraw all forces from Ukraine, almost all countries in West Asia signed the resolution on March 2.

Of 193 U.N. member countries, 141 voted to support the motion. Another 35 nations abstained. Only five voted against the resolution. Of those five, Syria was the only country from West Asia. The reasons for this are clear: Russia is an ally of Syrian dictator Bashar Assad and tipped the balance of the Syrian civil war in his favor when it entered that conflict in 2015. Iran and Iraq were among 35 official abstentions from the U.N. vote. Morocco did not vote at all.

In an anti-war statement, Iraq said it abstained "because of our historical background in Iraq and because of our sufferings resulting from the continuing wars against our peoples." All other West Asian nations joined the rest of the world in condemning the Russian invasion. But why did it take so long for these alleged friends and allies of the West to make that decision?

Political balancing act

For countries in the region, this is "100 per cent a balancing act," Dina Esfandiary, an adviser to the Middle East and North Africa program at the International Crisis Group think tank, told DW . "They are balancing between two giants." The way the United Arab Emirates behaved at last week's Security Council vote is a good example of this, Esfandiary noted. The UAE is chairing the U.N. Security Council, or UNSC, during March, after having joined as one of its 10 non-permanent members in January. Permanent members are the United Kingdom, China, France, the United States and Russia.

On February 25, a day after the Russian invasion began, the UNSC voted on a resolution to condemn it. Eleven of 15 countries agreed on the condemnation. Russia voted against it and three other members abstained: China, India and the UAE. "They [the UAE] were sending a message to the U.S. that 'we are not happy with you'," Esfandiary explained.

The UAE has apparently felt the U.S., with whom they cooperate closely on security, had not taken recent attacks on Abu Dhabi seriously enough. In January and February, Houthi rebels in nearby Yemen fired missiles and drones at Abu Dhabi. As a result, the UAE wanted a different Security Council resolution, one on the Houthis, to go their way. Russia eventually voted with the UAE on this resolution.

"So you can really see how the UAE were balancing everything up," Esfandiary said, noting that behavior was likely more of a reaction to current events than any set agenda. "But then I think in the lead-up to this vote [the resolution in the U.N. General Assembly], there was a lot more lobbying from the U.S. side," she continued. "I think that the Gulf states may even have realized that, OK, they made their point last week. I also think a country like the UAE may have been a little bit taken aback at how the international community reacted to their abstention [at the UNSC] last week."

"As they [the UAE] realized the global implications … they chose a hedging approach, trying to avoid picking one side," confirmed Cinzia Bianco, a visiting fellow at the Berlin office of the European Council on Foreign Relations, and an expert on the Gulf region.

Walking the talk?

But whether a vote at the U.N. translates into further action is another question altogether. While the majority of West Asian nations may have signed the resolution this week, only three — Israel, Kuwait and Turkey — seem to have actually mentioned Russia by name in carefully calibrated statements countries gave explaining their U.N. votes. Instead they emphasized peace, diplomacy and respect for territorial integrity of other countries. Some West Asian nations didn't even mention Ukraine.

Experts argue this balancing act has been going on for some time in West Asia and is due to the slow U.S. pivot away from the region, which started under former U.S. President Barack Obama. West Asian nations have realized they need a larger foreign policy friendship group. That's also why, at least at first, a lot of West Asian countries simply didn't see this as their fight.

They saw "the crisis as primarily engaging the interests of the U.S., E.U. and NATO, allowing them to remain safely on the sidelines," Gerald M. Feierstein, a senior vice president at the Washington-based think tank, the Middle East Institute, wrote in a briefing this week. They don't want to be "pressured to choose sides between their historic partnership with the U.S. and their growing economic and political ties to Russia."

Guns, oil, money

There are three main areas in which ties have developed between Russia and West Asia recently. Security is one. For countries like Jordan and Israel, Russia's hold over Syria plays a role. Israel depends on Russian cooperation to be able to strike at the proxies of its regional enemy Iran in Syria. Jordan is just next door to Syria. In July, the Security Council is supposed to vote to continue to allow humanitarian aid into northwestern Syria. As a permanent member of the council, with the ability to veto any decision, an angry Russia could hold that decision hostage. Russia has also backed factions fighting in Libya for a warlord sponsored by the UAE. It also has a relationship with Iran, with whom it must work in Syria; Iran also backs the Assad government there.

Another area of impact is trade. Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Lebanon and Egypt all import wheat from Ukraine and Russia and any shortage will cause them big problems and price rises. The UAE also acts as a major financial hub for Russians and will be forced to evaluate banking sanctions. And finally, Russia and West Asia share energy interests. In 2016, Russia joined an organization called OPEC+, which expanded the original Organization for Petroleum Exporting Countries and added more members. In OPEC+, Russia collaborates with major players like Saudi Arabia to regulate oil supply, and thereby oil prices.

When it comes to Saudi Arabia, it might even be a little personal. In 2018, Saudi Arabian leadership was under fire for the gruesome murder of Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi in Istanbul. Just two months later, at the G20 summit in Argentina, Russian President Vladimir Putin launched a media storm by greeting the increasingly isolated Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman with a peculiarly casual high-five and a huge smile.

Sign in to Unlock member-only benefits!
  • Bookmark stories to read later.
  • Comment on stories to start conversations.
  • Subscribe to our newsletters.
  • Get notified about discounts and offers to our products.
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment