`Thunder' is just a memory

Published : Oct 21, 2005 00:00 IST

THE naxalite movement, which originated at Naxalbari in Darjeeling district of West Bengal and spread to different parts of the country, is today confined to three districts in the State - Bankura, Purulia and West Midnapore. These are strategically important areas for the Communist Party of India (Maoist) to operate from, for, apart from the rugged terrain and forest cover, they share borders with Jharkhand, which enables naxalites to slip into the other State when the situation gets too hot in one.

Although the Maoists do not have a permanent base in West Bengal, there are reports about attempts to infiltrate into more districts and even Kolkata. In December last, six Maoist activists were arrested from Nadia district and three from Hooghly district. In June, Asit Jana, a CPI (Maoist) polit bureau member, was arrested from south Kolkata. Jana's whereabouts were revealed by two senior leaders of the organisation who had been arrested earlier this year. According to reports, Jana had made Kolkata his base, and had been sending consignments of explosives to other States through little-known courier services. In July, three other important leaders of the organisation were caught from the forest areas of Bardhaman district. The documents seized from them revealed plans to stage attacks and to make forays into the tribal belt in the western part of the State.

Most recently, on September 24, the police caught Chandi Sarkar and six others from Katgora village in Nadia. Sarkar is a State committee member of the organisation and the area commander of Nadia, Bardhaman, Birbhum and Purulia districts. A pistol made in Pakistan and 10 rounds of ammunition were recovered from them.

"There is no dearth of arms for the Maoists," says Raj Kanojia, Inspector-General, Law and Order. "Apart from improvised weapons, they use carbines, self-loading rifles and explosives." Asked how they were able to procure arms, Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee told Frontline: "It's a very complicated affair. The Indian Maoists have joined hands with the Nepalese Maoists, who maintain contact with terrorist outfits in the northeastern region, and the Inter-Services Intelligence is coordinating all of them."

The last major attack by the Maoists took place on July 9, when in two separate incidents in Bankura and Purulia districts, three district-level leaders of the ruling Communist Party of India (Marxist) and a police officer were killed and 16 others were injured. However, the attacks have been restricted to the region contiguous with Jharkhand. Although arrests have been made from other parts of the State, they have remained free from Maoist operations. One of the reasons for this is that in West Bengal, thanks to the decentralisaton of power, there is a strong Left Front base at the grassroots level. The State government has also remained firm in its stand that it will not enter into any dialogue with the Maoists until they give up violence.

The movement, started under the leadership of Charu Mazumdar and Kanu Sanyal at Naxalbari on May 25, 1967, was a peasant uprising for land. It later developed into an armed struggle. The operation was called `Khatam' (finish off), calling for the annihilation of zamindars and class oppressors. The movement spread to Kolkata, where it was spearheaded by youth leaders such as Ashim Chatterjee (a.k.a. Kaka) and Dipanjan Ray Chowdhuri.

On April 22, 1969, when the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) was launched on Lenin's birth centenary, the party formulated its objectives on the land-based struggle of the Naxalbari movement. But soon the inspiration of Naxalbari was rejected and in its place the CPI(M-L) embraced a policy of class enemy annihilation: no mass organisation, no constructive plan for land reforms and no definite programme for a mass movement. In fact, the movement degenerated into carrying out individual assassinations with apolitical elements joining in to exploit the situation. This brought about a distortion of the ideology, and the basic difference between communist armed struggle and terrorists operation became blurred.

The movement claimed to draw its inspiration from the Chinese revolution, and the CPI(M-L) slogan "China's Chairman is our Chairman" became a catchword of the day. In the late 1960s, a radio programme called "Thunder of Spring" broadcast by Radio Peking gained immense popularity among the naxalites. But this "paternal relationship" the CPI(M-L) insisted it had with China was not reciprocated. In the early 1970s, a team led by Sourin Bose went to China for guidance and support, but it was chastised by the Chinese leadership for misunderstanding and misinterpreting their lesson.

In 1972, the death of Charu Mazumdar in police lock-up broke the backbone of the movement. The final nail in the coffin came with the declaration of the Emergency in 1975, when all the important leaders and thousands of activists were imprisoned. By the time the Emergency was lifted in 1977, the movement had petered out.

Anil Biswas, CPI(M) State secretary and Polit Bureau member, in a recent article in Marxbadi Path, analysed the current upsurge in the naxal movement, and dubbed it anarchism in the guise of Maoism. According to him, Maoism is a term that was not used even by the Chinese Communist Party during Mao Zedong's lifetime or after his death. The Ninth Congress of the party had pointed out that Mao's thought was the application of Marxism and Leninism in the Chinese situation and that it was not necessarily applicable in any other country. In West Bengal it rose from a confusion about the character of the Indian state, which the Maoists wrongly understood as fully semi-colonial and semi-feudal, Indian Independence was debunked as a mere eyewash, the Indian ruling class as a mere agent of imperialist countries, and the Indian big bourgeoisie as a mere comprador class.

The 28th Article of the naxalites' programme lays down that their revolution will follow the path of the Chinese revolution. This, according to Biswas, is the principal source of the aberration, "for Mao himself had ridiculed the attempt by theoreticians who tried to understand the Chinese situation by reading about ancient Greece". The naxalites' blind faith in guerilla warfare as the only path to liberation is Blanquiesque anarchism, as it leaves out alternative methods of protest through Parliament, press, trade union movement and mass agitation, many of which were not available in China when Mao waged his war.

Sign in to Unlock member-only benefits!
  • Bookmark stories to read later.
  • Comment on stories to start conversations.
  • Subscribe to our newsletters.
  • Get notified about discounts and offers to our products.
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment