Food, the new crisis

Published : Sep 07, 2012 00:00 IST

Jose Graziano Da Silva, Director-General of the Food and Agriculture Organisation, has called on the U.S. to reduce substantially the diversion of maize for ethanol production.-REUTERS

Jose Graziano Da Silva, Director-General of the Food and Agriculture Organisation, has called on the U.S. to reduce substantially the diversion of maize for ethanol production.-REUTERS

A recession-hit world is only just waking up to the prospect of the coming food crisis resulting in a period of political turmoil with unexpected consequences.

For the third time in five years, the world is braced for another food crisis. Bad weather conditions are leading to projections of major production shortfalls in some of the worlds leading food suppliers. Substantially reduced access and sharp price increases are, therefore, expected to keep food out of the reach of a larger portion of the worlds population. The last two crises, in 2007-08 and 2011, led to food riots in many countries. So it is not just high food prices, increased hunger, localised famines and widespread increase in deprivation that are possibilities. Given the fact that the current food crisis occurs when the world is still steeped in the Great Recession that began in 2007, a period of political turmoil with unexpected consequences is also on the anvil. The world is only just waking up to this prospect.

With the worlds food basket consisting of a range of commodities sourced from varied locations, each crisis has its own special features. But the cumulative consequences are similar, especially since the developing crisis is being determined by expected weather-induced shortfalls in the larger producers. Prime among these is the United States, the central agricultural belts of which are experiencing their worst drought in almost half a century. Reports from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the U.S. are startling and almost unbelievable. July was the hottest single month in the country on record, and the first seven months of 2012 were on average the warmest since records began to be kept in 1895.

The two crops whose production has been affected the most by this extreme weather event are maize (corn) and soyabean. Between July and August, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) slashed its estimate of production from the standing corn crop by 2.2 billion bushels to 10.8 billion bushels. Half of the corn crop is assessed as being in poor or very poor condition, which is the worst assessment since 1988. The output of soyabean is also expected to be the lowest in five years.

These production shortfalls are significant for three reasons. To start with, the U.S. is the largest producer and exporter of corn. It accounts for nearly half of the worlds exports of corn and about one-third of the exports of soyabean. This implies that the effects of the shortfall on supply and prices will be transmitted quickly to global markets for this important grain. Second, corn has alternative uses besides directly entering the food chain. It is estimated that 40 per cent of the crop is absorbed by the ethanol companies and about a third is used as feed by the meat and poultry business. So, when output falls, demands from competing sources tend to drive prices up further. Finally, even if the worst production shortfalls are in corn and soyabean, other commodities, such as wheat, will also be affected since they can substitute for expensive corn. Thus, there are fears that wheat production will be diverted for feed production, affecting supplies available for direct human consumption.

Global signs

This is bad news because bad weather and expectations of output shortfalls are not restricted to the U.S. and maize and soyabean alone. Drought conditions have affected wheat production in the Black Sea region (Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan), which accounts for a quarter of global exports. Adverse weather is also expected to lower production in Australia, Argentina and China. To make matters worse, governments, such as Vladimir Putins in Russia, are expected to adopt policies to discourage exports, tightening global supplies.

The first signs of the likely results are already visible. There has been a sharp increase in the prices of certain foodgrains. The Food and Agriculture Organisations Food Price Index rose 6 per cent in July, driven by grain and sugar prices. Cereal prices rose 17 per cent in June relative to the previous month, maize prices by close to 23 per cent and wheat prices by around 19 per cent. In the U.S., the USDA predicts that corn and soyabean prices may break previous records. When prices begin to rise in this fashion, speculators enter the market and push up prices further. Corn and soyabean futures have turned buoyant, reflecting this possibility.

In sum, the world must brace itself for another food crisis. Poor developing-country exporters that have not recovered fully from the earlier crises would be affected the worst, more so because the dollar (in which global prices are quoted) has strengthened as a result of the flight of international investors to what is seen as a safe(r) currency. Reuters reports that West African countries such as Mali, Niger and Ivory Coast have cut tariffs on food imports as a means of containing the rise in domestic prices.

Clearly, action is needed at the supply end. FAO Director-General Jose Graziano da Silva, in an article in the Financial Times of August 9, called on the U.S. to reduce substantially the diversion of maize for ethanol production.

With world prices of cereals rising, the competition between the food, feed and fuel sectors for crops such as maize, sugar and oilseeds is likely to intensify. One way to alleviate some of the tension would be to lower or temporarily suspend the mandates on biofuels. At the moment, the renewable energy production in the U.S. is reported to have reached 15.2 billion gallons in 2012, for which it used the equivalent of some 121.9 million tonnes or about 40 per cent of U.S. maize production. An immediate, temporary suspension of that mandate would give some respite to the market and allow more of the crop to be channelled towards food and feed uses, he argues.

India, too, is likely to feel the effects of the imminent crisis. The southwest monsoon in the country has been deficient by an estimated 22 per cent, leading to delayed and much reduced sowing. So the kharif crop is expected to be significantly lower this agricultural year. With food prices already ruling high, this can have adverse consequences even without accounting for the global crisis.

However, Indias food economy has a buffer to fall back on. Good rainfall in 2010-11 had resulted in a recovery in production from its lower level in the previous relatively poor agricultural year (2009-10). In that year, rice production had fallen significantly and wheat production had stagnated. The better performance in 2010-11 was followed by a further rise in production in 2011-12. This took both rice and wheat production to about 4 per cent higher levels than their previous peaks.

While this is comforting, it is by no means a major step up in production. However, even this rise in production has resulted in excess stockholding in the system. In April 2012, rice and wheat stocks, at 333.5 lakh tonnes and 199.5 lakh tonnes respectively, were much higher than the prescribed minimum buffer limits of 142 lakh tonnes and 70 lakh tonnes respectively for that time of the year. As a consequence, the Food Corporation of India has run out of appropriate storage space for the stocks it procured and needs to hold. In the event, there have been recommendations from various quarters that the government must not only release stocks to the open market but should resort to exports, either directly or through market agents.

It is not only the availability of stocks in excess of the buffer required that is being used to justify such demands. It is suggested that exports of foodgrains when their prices in the international market are ruling relatively high will help the government recoup the expenditure incurred on procuring and storage and also endow domestic prices with a buoyancy that farmers can use to reap benefits just like their counterparts do elsewhere in the world.

What is being ignored here are the likely global effects of production shortfalls in the major food-exporting countries. With the government having made a principle out of calibrating domestic prices in line with international prices, the danger that the country will fritter away its excess food reserves rather than use them to strengthen food security in a period of global uncertainty is real.

Sign in to Unlock member-only benefits!
  • Bookmark stories to read later.
  • Comment on stories to start conversations.
  • Subscribe to our newsletters.
  • Get notified about discounts and offers to our products.
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment