Gene flow from India to Australia

Print edition : February 08, 2013

Australia was no longer connected to the mainland 4,000 years ago. So, the immigrants must have crossed the ocean by boat. Photo: by special arrangement

AUSTRALIA holds some of the earliest archaeological evidence for the presence of modern humans outside Africa, with the earliest sites dated to at least 45,000 years ago, making Australian aboriginals one of the oldest continuous populations outside Africa. It is commonly assumed that following the initial dispersal of people into Sahul (joint Australia-New Guinea landmass), and until the arrival of the Europeans late in the 18th century, there was no contact between Australia and the rest of the world.

A study led by Irina Pugach of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, found a common origin for Australian, New Guinean and the Philippine Mamanwa populations, which followed an early southern migration route out of Africa.

Irina Pugach and colleagues now analysed genetic variation from across the genome from aboriginal Australians, New Guineans, island South-East Asians, and Indians. Their findings suggest substantial gene flow from India to Australia 4,230 years ago during the Holocene, well before European contact. “Interestingly,” says Irina Pugach, “this date also coincides with many changes in the archaeological record of Australia, which include a sudden change in plant processing and stone tool technologies, with microliths appearing for the first time, and the first appearance of the dingo in the fossil record. Since we detect inflow of genes from India into Australia at around the same time, it is likely that these changes were related to this migration.”

Their analyses also reveal a common origin for populations from Australia, New Guinea and the Mamanwa—a Negrito group from the Philippines—and they estimated that these groups split from each other about 36,000 years ago. The researcher Mark Stoneking says: “This finding supports the view that these populations represent the descendants of an early ‘southern route’ migration out of Africa, while other populations in the region arrived later by a separate dispersal.”

This also indicates that Australians and New Guineans diverged early in the history of Sahul, and not when the lands were separated by rising sea waters around 8,000 years ago.

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor