Tata Steel & Salwa Judum

Print edition : March 12, 2010

This is with reference to the story Behind the concern (February 26).

Frontline

The two points mentioned in the article from the draft report The biggest grab of Tribal Lands after Columbus & The first financiers of Salwa Judum were Tata were withdrawn by the Ministry in its final report.

We would like to inform you that we signed a formal MoU with the Chhattisgarh government to set up a 5.5 MT steel plant in 2005. On the request of the State government, Tata Steel decided to set up its plant in Bastar.

We agreed to go to the Jagdalpur/Bastar area owing to the need we felt to develop one of Indias most backward areas although it was not the best location the area does not even have a proper railway connection, which is critical for a steel project of the size we planned.

We would also like to inform you that the first movement against the naxalites was the Jan Jagran Abhiyan, started in 1991 by Mahendra Karma. This later collapsed, and the leaders had to seek police protection to survive. In 2005, it was renamed Salwa Judum, meaning Purification Hunt (in the Gondi language), and it is reported that civilians were armed to supposedly fight the naxalites in the region. And in mid-2008, the movements leader, Mahendra Karma, announced that Salwa Judum will soon cease to exist.

We emphatically declare that we have never supported or financed Salwa Judum or any such organisation. We are not connected with it in any way, now or in the past. Tata Steel has always been known as a company fully committed to the well-being of the communities it operates in, especially those of tribal people, with whom it has a 100-year-old history of engagement and sharing of the wealth generated by the enterprise in Jamshedpur. Our community development initiatives have ensured a qualitative improvement in the standard of living of the people of the operational and project areas, be it in education, health services, development of sports activities, increase in income, entrepreneurship development, empowerment of women, preservation of tribal culture, and much more.

This is a well-known fact, and there is evidence of this in the over 800 villages that we work in, which the members of the committee ignored during the survey. We would like to once again state that the said article has erroneously reported facts without checking them.

A letter from the Editor


Dear reader,

The COVID-19-induced lockdown and the absolute necessity for human beings to maintain a physical distance from one another in order to contain the pandemic has changed our lives in unimaginable ways. The print medium all over the world is no exception.

As the distribution of printed copies is unlikely to resume any time soon, Frontline will come to you only through the digital platform until the return of normality. The resources needed to keep up the good work that Frontline has been doing for the past 35 years and more are immense. It is a long journey indeed. Readers who have been part of this journey are our source of strength.

Subscribing to the online edition, I am confident, will make it mutually beneficial.

Sincerely,

R. Vijaya Sankar

Editor, Frontline

Support Quality Journalism
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
×