Education

Failing the education sector

Print edition : March 02, 2018

The dilapidated condition of a government school in Adavihulagbal village, Karnataka. A quarter of government schools in India lack basic infrastructure such as toilets and functional classrooms. Many government schools are being run down and then closed, forcing parents to enrol their children in private schools. Photo: Rajendra Singh Hajeri

The overarching theme of Budget 2018-19 is that of privatisation, and the budget for higher education is no different, with substantial cuts in allocations to the University Grants Commission and Central universities as well as outlays for the IITs and IIMs.

FORGET the massive and overblown promises to farmers and on health insurance, which were not covered by any budgetary provisions. Ignore the supposed increases in rural development spending, which are all to be met through “extra-budgetary and non-budgetary sources”. Disregard the declared concern for rural areas, the poor and women, which has translated into next to nothing in terms of actual allocations. The real story of this Union Budget is not to be found in the verbose rhetoric of the Finance Minister’s speech or in the supposedly “big ticket” items, which amount more to a manifesto of the ruling party for the forthcoming general election than any real declaration of the government’s spending intent. Rather, it is concealed in the minutiae of the Central government’s spending plans, especially the plans for the social sector.

If there is one overarching theme in Budget 2018-19, it is that of privatisation. That is why it is quite amusing to see some reactions criticising it for being too “socialistic”—the reality is quite the opposite. The grandiose health insurance plan (if it ever does get off the ground) is essentially the government reneging on its responsibility for healthcare, which throws open tertiary medical care to private providers even though that move is fraught with problems, given the imperfections and poor regulation in this sector. Public health programmes are being undermined, with an absolute reduction in the allocation to the National Health Mission; the flagship Swachh Bharat Abhiyan gets less money so that sanitation needs will also have to be met through private provision; money for the rural public housing programme has been cut, which means even the poor who need houses will be able to rely less on public funding; and so on.

Underfunded education

The thrust towards privatisation is also clearly evident in the patterns of education spending. The Budget speech emphasised education as a priority area, but once again there were no allocations to match. In fact, the share of the Human Resource Development Ministry in total Central government expenditure is slated to be the lowest in the last five years, at less than 3.5 per cent. Total education spending is budgeted to increase by less than 4 per cent over the previous year’s allocation, indicating a decline in real terms, after accounting for inflation. So any real changes are clearly expected to come from the private sector and to be financed by private participation. The implications, such as declining spread, reduced access, greater exclusion and increased inequality are obvious.

School education remains significantly underfunded relative to the country’s needs, denying the bulk of our children access to good quality schooling, essentially because the state cannot be bothered to spend the required money. At least 80 million children are still out of school, and many of those who are enrolled do not attend regularly because of the abysmal quality of infrastructure and basic provision. A quarter of government schools lack basic infrastructure such as toilets and functional classrooms.

Ten per cent of schools still have only a single teacher for all grades. Around a million teaching posts are vacant in schools across the country, amounting to nearly one-fifth of the teaching positions. Many government schools are being run down and then closed, forcing parents to enrol their children in private schools. Teacher training and retraining is still well below target, even though the government keeps pushing back the dates by which targets must be met. Fixing all this is urgent and more time cannot be lost—but clearly for the Central government the matter is not pressing enough to increase allocations accordingly.

Instead, verbiage is deployed to compensate for spending, in the smoke-and-mirrors routine that has now become standard for this government. Operation Digital Board for schools was announced with the usual fanfare, but the budgetary allocation for digital e-learning has actually been reduced to a paltry Rs.456 crore. As it happens, official data tell us that in 2015-16 only 62 per cent of schools had electricity connections, only 24 per cent had functional computers—and only 9 per cent had both! So it is not clear how many government schools are in any position to take advantage of such a scheme.

Commercial approach

In higher education, the Finance Minister announced a new scheme “Revitalising Infrastructure and Systems in Education”, or RISE. This, in itself, is all to the good—it is probably much more important to upgrade and improve existing institutions than to go on mindlessly creating new ones. But the catch is that this is not to be financed from the Budget, but from the new Higher Education Financing Authority (HEFA) which is a non-bank financial company set up last year by the government in association with Canara Bank in order to provide low-cost loans to educational institutions. The borrowing institution has to repay the principal while the Central government will pay interest costs. HEFA has been given a budgetary allocation of Rs.2,750 crore and told to raise Rs.1,00,000 crore from the market. Already in 2017 it provided Rs.2,066 crore as loans to six engineering colleges.

This means that universities and colleges will have to borrow money from HEFA if they want to upgrade and improve—and obviously, repayment of these loans will depend on their being able to generate more revenues from students’ fees. So if not today, at least in the near future, students will have to pay for this supposed improvement in infrastructure and facilities through higher fees. This is quite a shift from the previous grant-based allocations of funds to public higher education institutions and will, to a significant extent, force a commercial approach on them because of the problem of eventual repayment.

It is true that in the past, money had been allocated disproportionately to some “institutions of excellence”, while leaving the vast majority of universities and colleges massively underfunded. But this shift is the opposite of a solution to that discrepancy. In keeping with the overall approach of commercialising and privatising higher education, the total budget for higher education sees an increase of only Rs.148 crore (or 0.4 per cent) over the previous year’s budget outlay, which amounts to a real decline after accounting for inflation. The Budget has substantially cut allocations to the University Grants Commission that funds Central universities and part-funds many State universities, as well as outlays for the Indian Institutes of Technology and Indian Institutes of Management. Central universities will get significantly less money, even though many of them are also underfunded relative to needs. And this move will force all institutions, including less-privileged institutions, to seek ways to borrow in order to access additional funds and then look for ways of raising their own resources, which can ultimately only come from students.

Exclusionary process

This is likely to generate a deeply exclusionary process that will deny access to tens of millions of young people from less well-off families. It is also likely to generate the problem of student loans that has been plaguing the United States and a number of Asian countries that have opted for this privatised and loan-based model of higher education. Already, slightly more than two-thirds of tertiary education enrolment is in private institutions, which most students in the country can ill afford. Now even public institutions (many of which are being attacked in other ways and sought to be ground down so they cannot flourish in the realm of ideas and knowledge) are being forced into the straitjacket of looking for financial returns from their operations.

In the 2014 electoral campaign, the Bharatiya Janata Party and Narendra Modi had repeatedly promised to increase education spending to 6 per cent of the GDP. Instead, it has brought the spending down to less than 3.5 per cent of the government budget! Aspirational youth who looked to Modi and this government to bring them jobs and better quality education have received yet another slap in the face. No wonder the ruling party and its wider parivar seek to encourage and promote vigilante groups of the most aggressive and violent types, to divert the youth from asking questions about why they have been betrayed.

A letter from the Editor


Dear reader,

The COVID-19-induced lockdown and the absolute necessity for human beings to maintain a physical distance from one another in order to contain the pandemic has changed our lives in unimaginable ways. The print medium all over the world is no exception.

As the distribution of printed copies is unlikely to resume any time soon, Frontline will come to you only through the digital platform until the return of normality. The resources needed to keep up the good work that Frontline has been doing for the past 35 years and more are immense. It is a long journey indeed. Readers who have been part of this journey are our source of strength.

Subscribing to the online edition, I am confident, will make it mutually beneficial.

Sincerely,

R. Vijaya Sankar

Editor, Frontline

Support Quality Journalism
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
×