Perils of a success

Published : May 06, 2011 00:00 IST

Anna Hazare's success in mobilising the normally apolitical middle class speaks of a strong revulsion against corruption and shows up huge flaws in the system.

ANNA HAZARE has achieved what no political movement, campaign or party has accomplished in decades: namely, ensure the capitulation of the government on an important policy agenda. It is only very rarely that governments in India yield so completely on issues such as corruption and laws to curb and punish it. I cannot recall a single occasion since the mid-1970s when this has happened.

The United Progressive Alliance was no exception to this. Indeed, it resisted even the demand for a Joint Parliamentary Committee on the 2G telecom scam and allowed a whole session of Parliament to be wasted before it finally conceded the demand.

Hazare mobilised and energised the Twitter- and Facebook-loving upper layers of the middle class and dragged the media, in particular 24-hour television channels, behind him to a point where anchors became zealous advocates of his cause.

Through his indefinite fast on the Lok Pal Bill issue, Hazare has emerged as a parallel national power centre. The fast conjured up a virtual spectacle much like the cricket World Cup. The government probably decided that it would be far too risky to let his campaign grow any further lest it be infiltrated, exploited or captured by its political opponents or lead to an uncontrollable situation.

On the fourth day of the fast, it conceded the demand for a joint committee to draft the Lok Pal Bill, with equal representation from government and civil society nominees. This too is totally unprecedented. Typically, the government limits civil society representation in any advisory or consultative committee to a small proportion of this section's total strength.

Hopefully, the committee will produce a Bill that is far worthier than the officially drafted legislation, which protects corruption in a number of ways. It restricts complaints to the Lok Pal to those that have been routed through the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. It exempts civil servants from the Lok Pal's purview.

The Bill gives the Lok Pal no powers of prosecution and makes his/her decisions purely recommendatory, thus giving the government the freedom to decide whether to act on them or not. It also limits investigation into past corruption cases to only two years. It is not difficult to improve upon the Bill. The drafting committee can be expected to produce a legislation that gives the fight against corruption some real strength.

That said, the whole manner in which Hazare and his group ran their campaign, the group's composition, and part of its larger agenda raise uncomfortable questions. Contrary to media claims, the campaign was not spontaneous but carefully planned and well organised. It was planned at least two months in advance to begin on April 5. A participant who was interviewed on television confirmed this, including the date. So did the networks run by the yoga guru Baba Ramdev and the Art of Living leader Sri Sri Ravi Shankar. The organisers used a toll-free number in Mumbai and managed social networks to enthuse people to join Hazare's fast or express solidarity with it through candlelight vigils in numerous cities.

The campaign's organisers made their first attempt to focus on the issue of corruption one and a half years ago, when they lobbied for Kiran Bedi, a former Indian Police Service officer, to be appointed as the Chief Information Commissioner after the end of Wajahat Habibullah's tenure. They launched India Against Corruption and held two rallies in Delhi. One of them was held at Jantar Mantar last November.

Ramdev's Aastha channel gave these rallies extensive publicity, but they did not attract much public attention. That is when the organisers decided to rope in Anna Hazare. The key organisers included Kiran Bedi, Arvind Kejriwal of the non-governmental organisation Parivartan, and Ramdev and, secondarily, Rashtriya Lok Dal Member of Parliament Mahmud Madani, the Delhi diocese's Archbishop Vincent Concessao and Swami Agnivesh. Hazare has established himself as a crusader against corruption in Maharashtra, having forced some corrupt ministers to resign. With his image as a Gandhian who has a spartan lifestyle and a high moral stature, Hazare clicked instantly.

India Against Corruption took off in a big way. Over four million Twitter messages were mobilised. So were a few hundred to several hundred citizen volunteers, including high-profile Bollywood figures such as Aamir Khan, Shabana Azmi, Tom Alter and Anupam Kher. Many of the slogans of the campaign, including the branding of all 543 Lok Sabha Members of Parliament as thieves and defenders of corruption, betray well-entrenched middle-class prejudices.

This is the same social stratum, the top 15 per cent of the population, which rarely votes in elections and has contempt not just for politicians but for the political process of democracy itself. This elite neither experiences corruption nor is at its receiving end in the way the bulk of the poor are. But it has convinced itself that corruption is the primary drag on India's progress towards Great Powerhood.

In many ways, it is this same social group that led the anti-Mandal and anti-affirmative action agitations of the past. This class is fiercely individualistic and by and large believes the poor are what they are because they, unlike itself, are not enterprising enough. It was no surprise that some staunchly elitist organisations such as the Delhi Medical Association and Resident Welfare Associations notorious for their anti-poor stance during the demolition drive in Delhi turned up enthusiastically to back Hazare.

The antecedents of some of the key individuals are open to question. Ramdev, for instance, works closely with the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) pracharak K.N. Govindacharya in the Bharat Swabhiman movement and is himself close to the RSS ideology. Kiran Bedi scarcely hides her ambition to play a larger-than-life role in social and political affairs. Ravi Shankar, too, propagates deeply conservative ideas.

Hazare himself is politically nave and adheres to a crude, chauvinist form of nationalism as suggested by his lurid and outsized depiction of Bharat Mata on a map of India and his glorification of Shivaji.

Hazare claims to be a Gandhian but told his admirers that it was not enough to jail the corrupt; they must be hanged. He said: You might wonder how a Gandhian like me is talking about violent methods like hanging, but in today's context, [the] need is not of Mahatma Gandhi but of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.

The Hazare campaign poses other problems too. Its own draft Lok Pal Bill will concentrate too much power in the hands of one person without the checks and balances that are central to democracy. The accumulation of boundless privileges and the placing of all kinds of agencies under the Lok Pal will violate the principle of separation of powers. He/she will be more like the cartoon strip hero Judge Dredd, who dispenses instant justice while riding an enormously powerful motorcycle.

The Lok Pal's appointment is to be recommended by all manner of people, including Nobel Prize winners of Indian origin, recipients of the Indian government's Padma awards and, yes, Magsaysay prize winners, a category to which some of the campaign's leaders belong. None of them, barring the Lok Sabha Speaker, is an elected representative of the people with legitimacy deriving from the election.

However, this is part of a larger obsession of the campaign: it claims to speak in the name of the people. Civil society organisations are self-created, voluntary and self-appointed. They cannot lay claim to democratic legitimacy based on the principle of representation or accountability. They must not arrogate this role to themselves.

Various political parties, especially the Nationalist Congress Party whose president, Sharad Pawar, Hazare has long targeted and who resigned from the Group of Ministers on corruption and the Samajwadi Party have criticised Hazare's campaign on this ground and for interfering with the legitimate function of Parliament to enact laws. Yet others have condemned its arrogance and its bypassing of the political institutions of democracy on the grounds that India has a functioning democracy.

This point is only partly valid. India's political system is marked by numerous failures and an inability to deal with major issues of concern to people, including predatory neoliberal policies, dysfunctional public service delivery, and widespread corruption. Political parties do not respond to this dysfunctional state of affairs and have failed to mobilise the public on relevant issues. People like Hazare have stepped into the vacuum. Their agenda is problematic and can lead to dangerous forms of vigilantism. Nothing will stop the likes of Hazare and Ramdev from branding specific individuals corrupt and demanding their resignation by applying the pressure of middle-class mobilisation and by exploiting the elite's distrust of politics itself.

Hazare has already undercut the National Advisory Council, which was debating an alternative Lok Pal Bill. The NAC enjoys legitimacy because it was appointed by an elected government. Other institutions too could soon be weakened or bypassed.

Yet, as long as the political class continues to malfunction and refuses to address issues of urgent relevance to the people, such movements will grow, jolt the system, and create parallel power centres, which regrettably are accountable to nobody.

Sign in to Unlock member-only benefits!
  • Bookmark stories to read later.
  • Comment on stories to start conversations.
  • Subscribe to our newsletters.
  • Get notified about discounts and offers to our products.
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment